The archaeology of human thought and intelligence was the subject of my lecture this morning. Moving on from the functionalist processual approach of Binford in the 1960s (sort of a mathematic, scientific approach to archaeology), people started to consider how to reconstruct the ancient mind. We looked at Paleolithic toolkit developments, cognitive evolution, and Mithen's theory of cognitive 'modularity', which suggests that at one point in time our brains switched from thinking from modular thinking (i.e. like a monkey seeing a
python as dangerous, but not linking fresh python tracks to the possibility of danger), to our brains being an information processor.
Mithen's idea has since been refuted by archaeologists, but it's a very good question: how did our brains come into being today, and are the
y similar to our ancient people's brains? In what respects did they think like us, and how did it differ? A few days ago I saw this programme on iplayer:
No comments:
Post a Comment